Is that a tattoo on her back? I think letting a girl that young get a tattoo is much worse than the pictures.

Another one of the overly-conservative opinions on the female body and how we should be ashamed of taking a picture in what all of us wear, including children, to the beach.

Kristine you are the kind of person who will fall for ANYTHING. Defending this kind of advertising is another flaming-liberal opinion on how EVERYTHING should be allowed and nothing is sacred. Those poses are not just of little girls in the wrong type of swimwear (bikinis are sexy–little girls aren’t supposed to be sexy!!), but they are also suggestive poses that are also meant to be sexy. Sexualizing children is an awful thing to do. Cindy Crawford just like most celebrities is an irresponsible parent showing other parents that they should also be irresponsible. These photos just make me mad as anyone well knows that in our EXCESSIVELY sexually permissive society that has bred loads of pedophiles and other assorted deviants, that there are pedo’s right now ogling these photos. Shame on Cindy Crawford and any other parent who lets their kids be sexualized!!

Your sick! If you think bekini’s are bad for little girls, then write to the manufactures and designers and express your concerns? You can’t put shakles on kids to protect them, just good common sense. Why don’t they have implants for kids and people so when they do go missing they can be found more quickly. Heck, they do that for dogs and cats! I guess people don’t warrant the protection as much as pets. Boys should also wear tops as well becuase they have just as much to show as girls do.

As long as there is water, we will buy swim suits and the style is what warrants which swim suits we will purchase…Fact! On a whole different story we have the perverts(pedophiles) in this world and the number of them seem to grow by leaps and bounds. I think alot of that has to do with our legal system. Pedophiles seem to get a slap on the wrist or a very light sentence for their offence. This is WRONG!!! The child has to live with this for the rest of their life. Now that is a life sentence. Make the pervert pay dearly (possibly minus an organ) and I think that might deter other pedophiles. I think that could be their life sentence, plus prison time. I will be glad to donate tax money for those people to stay in prison. Back to where we were, us normal people just see a little girl in a cute swimsuit.

Ok little girls wear bikinis because they are cool in the summer heat. I wore one when I was little not to be sexy but to stay cool in. No one than tied it with porn and sexuality, because there was no need too. You guys are just over judging the mother and the photographer. As for the tattoo it?s a stick on or body art it?s not real they are fun I wore those as a kid too. GET OVER IT! The one where she?s topless can be seen as a little over the top. I don’t see them as being sexy I see them girls being cute. It’s how they are its how they will be. I can find a dozen pictures of me like that in my family photos, never once would I say they were wrong.

What is there to be appalled about ? And what its the girl doing in the picture that girls that age don’t do ? Finally … When you by your kids clothes who do you think should model that clothing ? I wish people you love to point the pedo-finger at everything would realize that those people are not normal men getting sexually aroused over little girls in “sexy” outfits. (if that’ the way you want to see childrens swimwear) Quite an over reaction. But I doubt a conservative opinion of the female body. More like to be someone who has experienced abuse themselves and has yet to find the courage to face what has happened to them.

Everyone is entitled to wear what they want, even if you think its wrong. It’s your choice to purchase the so called “kid bikini” or not. No one is twisting your arm. Fact. There are a lot of perverts out there that will eat up these pictures like there is no tomorrow. Who is at fault for this, the parents. Why not the designers you say? Like I said before, it’s our choice to do things or buy things. If the parents had enough sense they would’nt let their kids pose for such reveling clothes or what have you. I do have one problem with photos I did see and that would be with the little girl posing with just the bottoms and what looks like a tattoo. I believe that is going too far.

Wow….I have pictures of myself from childhood in my bikini on the beach & a couple of me in my underwear & an indian head dress with nothing else, running around the backyard. I used to write on myself, not the same as a tattoo, I realize, but it all washed off at the end of the day. Guess what! I was molested…. but it wasn’t until a few years later when I was running around fully clothed. Perverts are perverts no matter what you’re wearing. If someone is going to molest you, it doesn’t matter if you’re wearing a bikini or a pair of jeans, a sweater with a jacket and some boots.
I know this is an ugly world at times, so why don’t you stop wasting time getting mad at Cindy Crawford and get mad at the actual pedophiles who violate children and the courts who continue to let them out to do it!

The picture of her daughter topless is completely inappropriate. SureI have pictures of my little girl running around in her diaper on a hot summer day. But this one is posed to look sexy and alluring. The photographer needs to take a course on working with child models. He or she has made this darling little girl pose and look like an adult model. Shame on Cindy for not speaking up and protecting her little angel.

Oh, but the “topless” baby girl in the cute hat (would you put a boy in that hat?) advertisement that gave you money for your webpage is fine? Typical.

Kids wear swimwear. That’s a fact. Parent buy swimwear for kids. What in the heck is wrong with children modeling swimwear? What is there to be appalled by? Some people really need to get a life and stop looking at things to complain about. My goodness,it’s kids having fun showing different styles of two piece swimwear. Get over it. That is Cindy’s child and I’m sure she’s not doing it for the money, the child looks likes she’s enjoying herself. Go read a book or take a nap. Quit complaining.

i I think that its a terrible thing to do with a child’s picture on the internet or a magazine. The pose with her facing backwards looking over her shoulder is terrible for a little girl. I agree with the person who commented about the Jon Benet Ramsey case. This is something that a child molester looks at. I hope Ciny wakes up and doesnt allow her daughter to do this again!!!!

I dont see the big deal with letting little girls where bikini’s what do they have to show? nothing! only disgusting perverts see this as being sexual and they need to be ashamed of themselves.

I find the picture to be sweet and in good taste. The tattoo look like a temp which all kids love to put on and take off in a few days.

Why do some parents insist on policing other parents and their children?

I agree that if someone is physically abusing a child (or even an adult) then they should be stopped. I don’t see Cindy Crawford physically abusing her child, do you? In fact, I’d say Cindy Crawford loves her daughter very much.

But let’s say you’re right and modeling a swimsuit is abuse. Then we must cover all women and girls with a burqa, like certain Islamicists demand. No longer will swimsuit modeling be allowed in America, unless women and girls wear a burqa covering the swimsuit and the exposed naked flesh.

Of course, then the ultra-orthodox, conservative Islamicists will have won. Their demand that we adopt their puritanical, Victorian ways will now rule America and other western democracies…which will no longer be democracies of all the people, by all the people and of all the people.

I see what’s happening. Some people in our country believe that our democratic government should be used as a bludgeon by their religion…just like what is happening in ultra-orthodox Islamicist run countries.

So they attack a mother who is a world-famous model and her daughter who may just want to follow in her mother’s footsteps and be a model, too.

I recognize abuse when I see it. I recognize when someone is trying to bully someone else. Wasn’t 9/11 an attack on America by a religious bully? Wasn’t it an attack on America by some religious fanatic who can’t stand things like swimsuit modeling, whether by an adult or a child?

I hope this clarifies things for some of you. Anyone in America who even remotely advocates doing something that Osama bin Laden would approve of based on his ultra-orthodox religious agenda for the world should not be allowed anywhere near any of our democratic institutions, and definitely nowhere near public office…if anyone values anymore our liberal, “freedom-loving” democracy, that is.

Anybody remember the Coppertone ad with the little girl with the little dog pulling down her bikini bottoms? I don’t remember any outrage over that picture….

I personally have no problems with bikinis on little girls…I dont think they are “sexy” just pretty. I also dont think the pictures of the girls hugging is bad in anyway cause lets face it….little girls run up and hug each other all the time. I do however think the picture of her daughter topless is in bad taste. NOT because she is topless or because she has a fake tattoo, but because of the actual “pose”. The only other place I can remember seeing a similar pose is on the cover of Maxim or some other adult magazine and those models are adults. I think the pose is too “mature” a pose and just shows the new trend of dressing little girls like they are 18 instead of 7 . Case in point are stores like La Senza Girl……there are some cute clothes there, but there are also styles there which I myself would wear (I’m 28) and just think are too “old” for a young girl to wear. Why must we make our little kids grow up so fast?!?! Lets just let kids me kids !

I guess all you folks who think these are okay were also fine with the way Jon Benet Ramsey was sexualized in those photos. Bratz dolls are hunky dory as well. And NAMBLA’s being persecuted for their opinions, too!

Is America a tad prudish when it comes to sexuality? Probably. But little kids are OFF LIMITS. Period!

I can’t believe you people think those photos are inappropriate. She’s a child of perhaps 3 years old! What has gotten into you? Those photos are not sexy. Grow up people! There is absolutely nothing wrong with them.

If any of you see those images in a sexual way perhaps you ought to figure out what’s wrong with you. Those are not sexual images, they are just cute. It’s a shame many people have been twisted by a vile media and religious fanaticsm that perverts people’s perception of cute into something sexually suggestive or even pornographic. Now go call your parents and yell at them for taking photos of you in the bathtub when you were a child. Perhaps they are pedophiles as well.

I think some of you guys are missing the point. It’s not the kid in the two piece which reasonable people can disagree on. Forgetting the tattoo, whether it’s stick on or not, which it obviously is, we’re talking about a mother who should know better putting her child in front of a camera and posing in a way that 5 yr. olds should not pose. As a parent, I just think it’s wrong. Obviously, it’s her choice, but I find it in very bad taste.

Ask yourselves: Would these photos come across as suggestive and/or sexual if the models were adult women? In two of them, the answer is clearly “yes.” (The photo of the tea party is perfectly fine; it’s the other two — and especially the topless photo — that are inexcusable.)

Cindy Crawford — and any parent who would force a child into such a situation — should be ashamed of herself!

Five year old girls are not little adults and there is nothing suggestive about girls that age without a top.

Ask yourselves: Would these photos come across as suggestive and/or sexual if the model was Rosie O’Donnell? If you see sexuality in those images please get your head examined to find out why.
Cindy Crawford should be proud of her child not ashamed that she doesn’t dress her in a burkha like some of you would prefer. There is a place for people that think this is bad, it’s called Islam!

Kaia kind of looks more like her dad to me. She smiles alot like Rande. I don’t think she looks much like Cindy at all.

I think alot of you are missing the point.

The majority of the images that pedophiles own are normal looking photographs that you would find in any family photo album.

Whether or not you (or I) think these photo’s are suggestive or inappropriate isn’t really the issue. It is the fact that there ARE people out there who will use these images for sick and perverted things. Guaranteed. It is probably already happening as you read this.

So instead of debating over bikini’s (airy or evil?) You should ask yourself this:
Would you sell pictures like these of your own child(ren)? To be posted on the internet and available to any pervert with AOL? Would you risk exposing any child to those people for any amount of money?
I really hope for society’s sake the answer is a collective no.

I am sorry but anyone who think a two piece is not appropriate for a young child is sick! Why would you think a young girl looks sexy in that. That’s like saying if I put a two piece on my dog it would be too sexy and inappropriate. STUPID!
There are nothing wrong with some of these pictures and anyone who thinks they are sexy is horrible. Clean your mind!

However, I do think the picture with her topless (even though you can’t see anything) is over the top. No one should have a young child pose without clothes on, even if nothing is showing it will only bring out the sick minds mentioned above.

WHO cares want parents do to there own kids , its not huting anybody . You see this stuff all the time at the beach . You people need to grow up and stop thinking sick .

i think anyone who thinks this is too sexual for a little girl is putting too much thought into it! youre the sick’os. what about the little girl on the sunblock with nothing on but the panties showing her bottom… no fuss was made over that!

I’m interested in the age of the people posting the comments that the pose is not inappropriate. I have a 9 year old son. Since the age of 4, there have been little girls that acted “too interested” in him. I have found that younger mothers tend to encourage their young daugthers to have boyfriends and dress in little clothing. I have no problem with bikini’s. They’re cute. I have no problem with taking family snapshots of your little girl running around without her shirt. The main problem most of us have with the photo is the suggestive manner in which the photographer has placed the child. The tattoo on the lower back is a universal symbol (whether we want to admit it or not) among men that the girl is easy. I’m not saying there’s any truth to the symbol that the woman is easy, it is just a known fact among men….you’re chances with a girl who has the tattoo on the lower back are much easier…..To place a fake tattoo in this position on a five year old child and have her pose in such a way is unsettling. If you saw Tyra Banks or Cindy Crawford herself posing in this manner, you would see sex appeal. We all make mistakes as parents. Celebrities just have theirs aired for the public’s eye.

I’m not really sure as to why anyone would make a big deal about this. Any normal person see’s an adorable little girl sporting a bikini that is not sexy at all. It’s cute. I wore bakinis when I was little and I have grown to be a remarkable woman with a wonderful husband and high values. As for the picture with what is clearly a temporary tattoo, you cares, she’s not at the age of puberty where she is being violated. She’s 5. I walked around naked when I was 5, who honestly didn’t. If a 5 year old year should wear a top, then a 5 year old boy should too, because they look the same up top at that age anyhow. I see two adorable happy girls having a good time. Maybe people shouldn’t worry about Cindy Crawfords daughter wearing a cute bikini and focus on more important issues that are going on in the world. As a social worker I see children being abused and neglected on a daily basis. Stop focusing on priviledged children who are just having a good time and have top security so they don’t have to worry about being sexually solicited, and worry about children who lack the protection that they deserve. This is a beautiful child people, a 5 year old child. Get a life.

I don’t see how this picture is provactive. It’s a little girl looking over her shoulder. But, if you ask me, the Coppertone Girl is a heck of a lot more revealing and I don’t think it’s provocative either. And, as someone else pointed out, a pediophile gets turned on by kids doing normal kid things, not by the things a normal adult would consider sexy or provocative.

Has Cindy Crawford lost her mind? Posing in a bathing suit is one thing….posing topless with a tatoo is another and certainly not appropriate for this young child. Her mother should rethink what she is exposing her daughter to – and remember the JonBenet case.

I think the only picture that is inapropriate is the one of the child topless. Other than that I dont see what the big deal is. I have a 2 year old daughter that wears a bikini in the summertime and I don’t see anything wrong with it. I dont see what is your problem with the two girls hugging, I think that it is adorable. They look like two girls that are having a great time at the beach to me. If you think that the picture is perverted then maybe it is in your own mind?

I have always had the greatest respect for Cindy Crawford, as a model and as a woman. I do feel, however, that posing a 5-year-old, provocatively, is a poor choice. A mature man, of course, can appreciate the beauty of a little girl without becoming emotionally involved. He would treat her with all of the respect, tenderness and nurture which all children deserve. Unfortunately, nowadays, there are too many emotionally-stunted males who would sexualize this little girl. For that reason, I would encourage women not to make their babies targets. I will regard this as an error of judgement but please, Ms. Crawford, wait until she’s eighteen to let her model swimsuits.

Look at a bottle of Water Babies suntan lotion, in the print ads and even on television. What do you see? A baby walking while having her underpants pulled down by a puppy. Why is it that no one has ever complained about that? I don’t think Cindy Crawford did anything wrong: the tattoo is obviously fake, Little girls hug each other, and LOTS of small children wear bikinis. Lastly, a pedophile is a pediphile, pictures don’t create them.

I don’t understand the big fuss over her in the bathing suit. I mean most little girls wear them to the beach or in the pool. HOWEVER, I think the one of her topless with a fake tatoo is entirely INAPPROPRIATE. I just don’t understand parents pushing little girls to grow up so fast. That is a pose only appropriate for an adult. I don’t care if your mother is Cindy Crawford. It just isn’t right!!

I think she is absolutly cute in every photo, people need to stop blowing things out of proportion.

Having a little girl pose topless in a manner that would be considered sexy or erotic if the model was an adult is twisted. Children are NOT little adults. I seriously wonder about the commenters here that cannot seem to make that distinction. Sexualizing a child is vile and dressing them up like sexy little women is inexcusable. Those who are so vehemently insistent that this crap is cute need a reality check…

For all of you saying it’s not a “big deal”…when this girl turns up molested or into another Jon benet, please don’t change your tune. She looks like a whore in that picture. What’s next? Child Playboy?

What do you mean she looks like a whore in that picture. She looks like a little girl wearing a swimsuit. You go to the beach and see little kids in bikinis all the time. Do you go to each parent there and tell them their daughter should not be in a bikini and ask them to get their child covered up?

What is wrong with you people. A molester is going to molest a child no matter what she wears if he or she has the chance. What that image says to me is two little girls holding each other in some cute swimwear.

Over in France, it is normal for children up to around 4 to wear nothing at the beach and girls up till 9 or so to wear only bikini bottoms. Just because a girl is going to have breasts later on does not mean she has them now and needs to cover up. Her chest looks like that of a boys at that age and boys are alowed to go topless. There is no difference in the apearance of their chest and we think it is sick to see a topless girl but ok to see a topless boy.

Boys show more flesh then girls do, yet I hear no one screaming that the little boy in his swim trunks and no top will intice sick molesters. Why is that?

Thoughs who have children have takin photos of their kids in the bath alot, naked in the back yard, on the potty for the first time and so on and you think the photo of two girls in bikinis is sick and distasteful? I just can not understand your logic here.

^^^^^ That crap is uncalled for a “whore”??? The tattoo/topless pose is not something for a 5 year old I think Cindy Crawford should be ashamed of herself. If the pictures were for there memories then thats another story but when your making money off your childs tastless poses then I think theres a problem

In current magazines there are now shots of Cindy and her daughter on the red carpet. These photos clearly show the grow-out (Roots!) from the highlights/color that she had for this photo shoot. Alluring? Yes Too much for a 5-year old? Yes

You people are all retarded. Grow the fuck up and worry about something more important.

WOW, I didn’t know my tattoo was a WHORE tag! I am 49 years old and have had my whore tag for years and am very proud of it. I am a doctor and see many women with whore tags.

My daughter, who is a dentist, also has a tattoo on her lower back and one on her shoulder. I was with her when she got them. They are both beautiful works of art. She isn’t a whore either.

If our granddaughter decides to have a tattoo, we will support her decision fully when she is an adult. She is 9 years old and she has been playing with temp. tattoos since she was a toddler. I have also taken nude photos of her and she owns several bikinis. I do not view my granddaughter to be a whore because she likes to wear a bikini and use play tattoos.

Nor, do I think that way about this little girl. She is just a cute kid.

Now, trot along and find something that is really worth getting your panties bunched up about.

By the way, all that stress over a photo is not healthy. I suggest you try yoga to relax!

hello america,
i am writing from europe. yes, i have been to the states. and i must say, that i truly think, you still have to learn a lot, america. ask yourself, why you feel, this pictures are “sexy”? do you think that little girl understands what you feel or think? don’t you think and see, that she is simply enjoying her life? and she should be! honestly, i think this discussion is very sick. fear can stop you loving. love can stop your fear. i feel sorry for cindy and her family.
best, lacie

It’s only swimsuits people!!!! Kids have to wear them too! A pedophile will find what he wants anywhere. Let’s focus on more important things please.

honestly I don’t see anything wrong with this pics, if Cindy knows that everything is OK with her daughter and noone tries to molest her. Anyway she is normal woman and doesn’t say that “cleaning his baby girl little pussy is so sweet” as Jason Isaacs often says , and that is a problem . He is molesting his daughters and isn’t punished . That is sad, cause many people is hurting their kids and no one is doing nothing to help their babies

Of course, this all is very innocent, but in the troubled world of today, I can absolutley see why people would object to this. Many of these poses do seem to be sexual. Why does a 5 year old have a “come hither” look in a swimsuit?? How about throwing a ball or building sandcastles????

Well Ginger,old news. This actor rape little girl about 10 years ago, he is pedophile , everybody knows that. These pics are sweet.

I didn’t know that. But I don’t like him , he is such a poor and ugly actor.

I don’t see anything wrong with kid’s modeling swimwear so people can see what they’re buying for their kids… But there is something horribly wrong with that tattoo.. Not only is she a kid, but THAT’S THE WRONG PLACE. Any guy knows that the area that tattoo is at is refered to the bullseye, or the [you know what, 4 letter word, begins with s ends with t] magnet. I don’t think I need to explain anything more than that.. What the hell was Cindy Crawford thinking? She has ruined that kids life at such a young age.

Too bad Jason Isaacs can’t sue you idiots for slander, because that’s exactly what he should do. I’ll bet neither of you can site any real sources for your accusations. Crap like this is always based in rumors and innuendo without any real evidence to back it up.

Do you honestly think that if Jason was raping kids and molesting his daughters that it wouldn’t be all over the freaking news? And they damn sure wouldn’t let him act around children!! I mean really? How did you 2 nutcases find out about it? AND if it were true, I’m sure he would be locked up in a prison serving time somewhere, since this is “supposedly” public knowledge.

Don’t use that lame excuse that he is a celebrity so he is protected, because a “celebrity” can go to prison for child sexual abuse just like anyone else can.

Get a freaking life and stop spreading lies you losers! This man is just living his life and trying to make it in the world just like the rest of us. He doesn’t need some no life having fool on the internet trying to ruin his reputation!

it’s obvious , look at him, his gay blue eyes and this pedosmile, and yes because he is a celebrity ( and he studied law) he is protected, he loves kids too much and that’s seek, but you probably are in love with him so another stupid teenanger who loves a pedophile

sick of course not seek

Oh because he has blue eyes, a law degree, and loves kids he’s a pedophile? Right, so I guess based on that criteria, you could be a pedophile too. Because your argument has no merit. You are just spouting off BS just for the sake of it.

And you are wrong again, I’m not a teenager, but someone who is obviously more mature than you and have enough sense to get the “facts” first, before believing some unproven, unsubstantiated crap.

It just goes to prove that you aren’t very smart, because you do not possess the brain power to research for yourself, but to believe whatever is said to you simply because you do not care for a particular actor. But as the saying goes, never argue with an idiot, because it only brings you down to his/her level. So I rest my case.

isaacs pedo…? always knew that:) he loves his little whores too much ,did you know the older has Down disease ? awfull daddy

youknowwho- you are idiot
donna- his daughter looks foolish, she is fat and ugly, but she has ugly parents so what do you expect? didn’t know about her disease, she just has stupid face, on the other hand her mother is an old slut , too old for giving birth so maybe you are right

oh and her name “silly lilly” sucks hehehe

o why don’t u people just grow up i mean come on its just a little innocent picture of a beatufil little girl and as a fact i happen to know that a profeshinal photographer wen’t up to cindy craford if he could take some pictures of her daughter so get ur heads out of ur ass

why cant people gripe and bitch about mothers and females killing a baby at 3 months and 6 months which is murder they suck the childs brains out people will bitch about bkins on kids but no a precious child ohh shut the fuck up

Wow, I didn’t realize how many people out there were lacking common sence, as well as the capacity to put a few safeguards on thier children. Just further proves the moral decay of this society. First of all ‘never’ should a baby girl be posed like some playboy model, topless peeking over her shoulder in such a suggestive post. That is just plain sick. Pediphiles feed on this sort of thing. Sicko’s dont become obsessed with something they haven’t seen. They become obsessed with wha they have seen. If you advertise you’ll probably get customers. In fact photos like this for financial gain should be illegal.

look at this interview with mister pedophile Isaacs:”Sometimes I talk to people who say, ‘I don’t really want kids. I’m too selfish.’ I’m thinking, ‘You are exactly the person who ought to have children specialy daughters like I have ,you can smell their beautiful pink pussies and touch their little nipples . I love to do that really and Emma knows about that (laugh)”
That guy is really sick.

I have no problems with these pictures – they are cute and innocent. i have seen many little girls dressed like this on the beach. i would let my daughter wear this as well as model it.

Religious, responsible mother of grown teenage girls with good morals.

hi again, sorry for the post about Isaacs , the interview is fake and was post only for some stupid friend of mine that I hate, Jason of course is not a pedophile so Jason if you read this sorry once again ( well i was little drunk when I wrote this”

Americans ^^

Killing children all over the world, in the name of the “liberty”, but can’t see an lucky, inocent child in swimwear pfffff thats absolutely absurd.

Bikini’s for kids are a little silly. I think the second shot is the more natural since a girl that age isn’t really required to wear a top. Of course in some states and provinces the law has been properly defined to disclude adult female breasts from the def of ‘nudity’, just as male breast have been. Oddly, I most places persons below the age of 10 or 12 are not legally required to wear anything, adult sensabilities aside. BTW, pedos don’t care if kids are clothed or not and by making us sexualize every part of childhood they are winning. We do need to stop projecting our hang-ups and sex-phobia on our kids. Kids can be protected without locking them in their rooms and dressing them in burka’s. Kids and teens, especially teen girls such as myself, have enough problems with sexual identity and body acceptance as it is. Telling them sex is indecent and their bodies are obscene dosen’t help.

Your missing the point retards. A Pedophile is just a normal man who has gone emotionally insane, so the person who said “A Pedophile is a pedophile and images don’t create them” is full of shit and has absolutely no idea what s/he is talking about.

Any man can be aroused by literally anything, the brain and the sexual-arousal system is very complex and incoherent, the fact that little girls have a Vagina is enough to entice 99% of men out there and give them an erection. Most however, can control it, and do not let it ruin and/or intefere with there life.

Your all full of shit, we are born naked, we are programmed to love each other with close physical contact, it’s what we are suppose to do. Get those visions of JonBenet killings out of your mind you pseudo-intellect fucks, because i will tell you right now that the person who killed JonBenet wasn’t even a pedophile. If you don’t believe me then look at all of the reports, the profilings, and just the fact that he didn’t even sexually molest her. The case has nothing to do with pedophelia, it has to do with revenge and extreme envy, and plain psychopathy.

Remarkably however i would say that this Woman who has let her daughters model like this is a plain slut, and turning her pre-pubescent daughters into sluts as well. It’s beautiful and fine to let your kids be in bikini’s, but sexualising and commercializing it is the most vile sordid act that is far worse than pedophelia. And hurts alot more people….

I think the first and third pic is ok.But the second one is inapropreite.look she has no top onnnnnn god you sick basterd